• editor@pphm.life
  • No.1 Health News
Follow Us on
PP Health Malaysia Banner PPHM

New Study Shows Low Risk Individuals May Only Need Colonoscopy for Colon Cancer Every 15 years

A recent study published in JAMA Oncology has sparked discussions among medical experts regarding the recommended frequency of colonoscopies for individuals with no family history of colorectal cancer. The study, conducted in Sweden, suggests that adults who have tested negative for colorectal cancer after an initial colonoscopy may not need another screening for 15 years, as opposed to the current guideline of every 10 years.

The research, led by scientists at the German Cancer Research Center in Heidelberg, analysed data from over 110,000 Swedish adults who underwent their first colonoscopy between 1990 and 2016. The participants, with an average age of 59 and no family history of colorectal cancer, were compared against a control group who did not receive a colonoscopy. The study aimed to evaluate the incidence of colorectal cancer and related mortality rates over a 10-year period.

Results from the study revealed that individuals who received a negative result from their first colonoscopy had a significantly lower risk of developing colorectal cancer and dying from it within the following decade. Based on these findings, the researchers suggested that extending the interval between screenings to 15 years for this particular group could be equally effective in detecting cancer while reducing the number of unnecessary procedures.

Experts have acknowledged the robustness of the study; however, some have raised concerns about the generalisability of the findings to more diverse populations outside of Sweden, such as those in the United States. While the study’s recommendations may hold true for the Swedish population, further research and data from other regions are needed to assess its applicability on a broader scale.

The proposal to extend the time between colonoscopies for certain individuals reflects a shift towards optimising colorectal cancer screening guidelines to maximise benefits while minimising potential harms. Colonoscopies, like any medical procedure, carry inherent risks and benefits that must be carefully considered. By re-evaluating screening intervals, healthcare providers aim to strike a balance between early cancer detection and reducing the burden of unnecessary colonoscopies.

Colorectal cancer screening recommendations are not set in stone and are subject to ongoing evaluation based on emerging research and clinical insights. The goal is to ensure that screening protocols align with the latest evidence and best practices in cancer prevention. As advancements in medical technology and research continue to evolve, so too will the guidelines surrounding colorectal cancer screening.

The debate surrounding the optimal frequency of colonoscopies underscores the complexity of healthcare decision-making. While regular screenings play a crucial role in detecting colorectal cancer early, it is equally important to weigh the risks and benefits associated with each procedure. By tailoring screening recommendations to individual risk profiles and health histories, healthcare providers can deliver more personalised and effective care to their patients.

The evolving landscape of colorectal cancer screening guidelines highlights the dynamic nature of modern healthcare practices. As researchers continue to explore new avenues for improving cancer detection and prevention, it is essential to remain vigilant in evaluating and adapting screening protocols to best serve patient needs. By staying abreast of the latest developments in colorectal cancer research, healthcare professionals can make informed decisions that prioritise patient health and well-being above all else.

author avatar
Editorial Team
Disclaimer: Editorial content on this site is for general information only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider with any questions about your health. While we take care to ensure accuracy, we make no guarantees and accept no responsibility for any errors, omissions, outdated information or any consequences arising from use of this site. Views expressed in articles, interviews and features are those of the authors or contributors and do not  necessarily reflect the views of the publisher. References to, or advertisements for, products or services do not constitute endorsements, and we do not guarantee their quality, safety or effectiveness. You can read our editorial policy.

Discover more from PP Health Malaysia

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading